SC: Prosecutors want 20-year sentence for ex-South Carolina lawmaker for sharing child sex abuse videos

Source: abcnews.go.com 1/13/26

Prosecutors are seeking a 20-year sentence for a former South Carolina legislator who pleaded guilty to distributing child sex abuse videos on social media

 

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Prosecutors are asking a judge to sentence a former Republican South Carolina legislator to 20 years in prison for sending hundreds of videos of children being sexually abused to people across the country on social media as he advocated for several laws meant to protect kids.

RJ May is asking the judge for mercy and a five-year sentence, saying he was addicted to pornography and screens made worse by an increased sex drive from testosterone treatments. He said he wants a chance outside prison to be an example of how easily porn can destroy lives and families.

Judge Cameron McGowan Currie will listen to both sides Wednesday before handing down her decision in a federal courtroom just blocks from where May used to be a member of the South Carolina House.

May, 39, pleaded guilty in September to what prosecutors in court papers called a “five-day child pornography spree” in the spring of 2024.

May, who resigned earlier this year, is accused of using the screen name “joebidennnn69” to exchange 220 different files of toddlers and young children on the Kik social media network, according to court documents that graphically detailed the videos.

Prosecutors said May revictimized those children every time he shared a file. They said his crime showed extra hypocrisy as he voted eight times for laws protecting children or strengthening penalties for abusing them.

 

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Oh no it wasn’t hypocrisy. He voted that way deliberately. So as to try make sure the public would never suspect him of something like this. But it never occurred to him that eventually members of the public would start to ask themselves “Why is this guy so obsessed with this stuff? It’s all he ever talks about.”

Last edited 16 days ago by PO'd Registered Citizen

Karma. He will now endure a fate he fought so hard to inflict on others. I am sorry for his family and, to some extent him, because no one should have to endure the registry and its consequences.

Wish I could agree it is Karma, but he brought this on himself (and his family/friends). He knew what he was doing despite his younger years. If there were problems from then, then he should’ve addressed them. Maybe this was his was of saying to himself he needed help, but he couldn’t find the way to do it and took a lot of people down with him because of his legislative actions. Maybe he felt he was invincible as a legislator and could get away with it. Maybe he wanted retribution against those of yesterday who inflicted harm upon him. Whatever it may be, he unnecessarily made life harder and worse for many who did not deserve it because of his own thinking and actions.

He will certainly get the eye for an eye treatment now for the rest of his life and will understand consequences of his own actions (personally & legislatively) whether living in SC or VA with his father. Maybe when he is released, he can speak more to the outcomes of his legislative actions related to PFRs as he lives them along with the issues with the materials he partook in.

“He said he wants a chance outside prison to be an example of how easily porn can destroy lives and families.”

So now only after getting caught he feels that way and NOT before while on his soap box advocating for “tough on crime” against this?

LOL so much irony and hypocrisy to unpack here.

My first question is why isn’t the DA or aide that watched the media in order to “graphically detail” them to the court being charged for accessing CP? If viewing “re-victimizes” those depicted, how is that viewership excluded? And why isn’t “graphic detailing” considered distribution?

According to FAC, he got 17.5 years on his actions against minors, but had other allegations of abusing women overseas (which couldn’t be found to testify).

Give him 5,000 years of hard labor carrying all of his BS he supported as a lawmaker. He would never have shown any mercy to any of us, so why should we be merciful to him.

This person’s actions and their consequences gives truth to the words of Jesus when he said, “For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”

Christians and those making our laws should consider how their personal actions may be judged by a higher authority when it comes to their willful choice to condemn others.